The dilution of the operating system

As you might know, I resigned from a position I had for exactly 10 years, exclusively supporting Microsoft .NET development. That was a couple of months ago. Without “having” to stay on Windows anymore in my new role, I’ve been having a walkabout with other operating systems. Specifically, I’ve been living almost exclusively off of Ubuntu Linux and MacOS for the past couple of months. What have I learned?

image image image

First, I learned that if you use Windows, virtually every possible “regular” app you would use, is available in some form on these other operating systems. So, you could easily use either of these operating systems. I mean even things like the Kindle app for Windows, it’s available for Mac, but what about Linux? Well, there is and it’s the full Amazon Kindle app experience, right in the browser. Similar for OneNote, there is a native app for Windows and MacOS, but on Linux, you can just use the browser app via to open your OneNote notebooks. The web UX isn’t quite as nice, but it’s totally doable. Even apps like Skype are available natively on Ubuntu and MacOS now too.

Second, everything is coming to every operating system. The Ubuntu Linux command-line has come to Windows 10, PowerShell is now open source is is available on Linux and MacOS, etc. If there is a useful app, it seems that it’s just a matter of time before it’s available on “the other” platforms.

Using Windows full-time:
Why even wander away from Windows in the first place? Well first for me, is the outrageous security and privacy things in Windows 10. “When something is free, YOU are the product”, as the saying goes. Now that we know that Windows regularly sends data, in addition to them tracking everything you do is just… creepy, unnecessary, and when they are inevitably hacked, can only be bad. It’s just “accepted” that it’s OK that someone wander around your house and observe everything you do, and document it too – it’s just crazy. I mean, because it’s your “personal computer” even more private than your home, nowadays?

But even aside from that, which I acknowledge, some people don’t care about – Windows is also frustrating to use, compared to Linux. When you are working in the command-line, Windows hasn’t really changed much since the 1980’s. It’s a woefully lacking environment. Then, there are sometimes Unix-y things that you want or need to do, where Windows just can’t do it. For example, I changed how my DHCP/DNS works at my house and needed to track down which remote machines were using which IP addresses. Nmap works easily and quickly on Linux. So – Windows is not an “everything I want” environment.

Using Ubuntu full-time:
If you are going to use Linux, and want things to “just work”, then Ubuntu is the only practical answer. This is because if a vendor takes the time to get their product working on Linux, they address Ubuntu first, because it’s the most popular. I’ve been pleasantly surprised by my experience. Even advanced things like getting a fingerprint reader to work, and having simple whole-disk encryption (similar to BitLocker) are easy to use. At the hardware-level, since Ubuntu has a far, far smaller footprint, it seems to use far less battery – which is really good for laptop use. To give you a reference, Ubuntu, with the Unity window manager open just idling, uses about 700mb of RAM. Windows, just sitting idling uses about 2,000mb of RAM (2GB).

Despite it being a great platform, it’s not all great. First is MS Office and OneNote, specifically. For Office, you can use LibreOffice, which comes pre-installed. This can open and save MS Office formatted-files… but not perfectly. It has corrupted both Word and Excel files by messing up the formatting just a little bit. That’s not cool. And OneNote, because there is no native app, you have to use it in the browser, which is not a great experience. It gets the job done, but it’s not a great experience.

With that said, there is one big benefit – I have found Windows running in VirtualBox on Linux is much more flawless/seamless than any other platform, and it’s definitely better than running Ubuntu in a virtual machine. The window manager (Unity) in Ubuntu uses hardware acceleration, so when you run it in a VM, you see lag and slow UI performance. Meaning, that Ubuntu hosting Windows is definitely the best computer-in-computer environment I’ve run across. However, the battery drains 2x to 3x faster when running Windows in a VM though,so it’s not a mobile/portable solution – you need to be near a plug. So – Ubuntu too is not an “everything I want” environment.

Using MacOS full-time:
I initially exposed myself to MacOS when I started looking at Xamarin a few years ago. I was really pleasantly surprised, by two things mainly. First was that I didn’t realize that pretty much every product that exists for Windows, also has a native release for MacOS too. And secondly, how pretty and seamless the user experience is. So, using MacOS, I can use Office for Mac, including a native OneNote app, the command-line IS a “bash” shell, which also has the same experience as Linux. Well, almost completely. There is even a “package manager” called “brew” where you can install apps – with something like “brew install app-name”. What’s not to love?!

Well, there are a few things to not-love. First, virtualization in every technology, is… kind of bad. Using VirtualBox for example, no matter if you are hosting Linux or Windows, those client machines are laggy, choppy, and noticeably slow. I have the latest MacBook Pro too – with an i7 CPU – so it’s not hardware, either! Also, when you hook up a couple of extra monitors to it, the whole UI slows down significantly, whereas Windows didn’t. So, it works EXTREMELY well on a laptop with one screen, but when you start pushing the hardware, you quickly see the cracks.

Next, is the keyboard. Mac has it’s own ecosystem and has been living a parallel life next to Windows for decades. So, common keyboard layouts and keyboard shortcuts are different and it drives me nuts. For example, instead of CTRL+C and CTRL+V for copy and paste, it’s Command+C and Command+V.


If you are using a “regular” keyboard or connecting remotely, this translates to WindowsKey+C and WindowsKey+V. Ctrl+V brings you to the end of the page for some reason. Imagine trying to paste a link into a Facebook post (where you are scrolled halfway down and do CTRL+V – which brings you to the bottom of the scroll. You have to scroll back up and find that post – then you find out and you didn’t even have it copied because it’s “the other” keyboard shortcut.

I realize this may sound nit-picky, but it’s not. As a developer, there is no “Home” or “End” keys for example, or even a “Delete” key. To do those things you have to do: Fn+Backspace for Delete, Fn+LeftArrow for Home, and Fn+RightArrow for End. To be productive while coding is difficult, especially if you’ve used a non-Mac keyboard layout and shortcuts for decades. So – MacOS too is not an “everything I want” environment.

Which OS is best?
In short, none… or all. There is no clear winner. In fact, the reason for this post is I realized that these three operating systems are extremely similar and are moving closer together every day. If you have VM’s – use Windows or Ubuntu. If you want very snappy performance and beautiful UI, but wonky keyboard, use MacOS. Want a great command-line interface and robust package manager, use MacOS or Linux, but not Windows. Need MS Office and especially OneNote? Use Windows or MacOS, but not Ubuntu.

Bottom line:
In my little pseudo-experiment, I’ve realized I’m not entirely happy with any of these OS’s, and none of them stand out as being particularly great nor particularly bad. They are all like 85% the same, and the 15% they are different is mostly a good difference, which is a deficit of one of the others.

My goal was to find “the ultimate” setup where I could live out of one laptop and have ALL of the things want. My conclusion? The technology isn’t quite there yet. You just have to pick one and be ok with not being satisfied. MacOS would be my choice except the keyboard and the performance are showstoppers. Ubuntu would be my choice, but the lack of native MS Excel and OneNote are showstoppers. Windows 10 would be my choice, but the electronic stalking and terrible command-line are showstoppers.

You tell me: what am I missing? What is the “ultimate” computing environment in present day?

Posted in Apple Stuff, Computers and Internet, General, Infrastructure, Linux, Uncategorized, Windows
2 comments on “The dilution of the operating system
  1. Juan says:

    No one likes Unity, that is why many people went with Mint, much better experience if you ask me.
    MS Office has done it best to keep the likes of Libre Office from working properly.

    Full time linux user for 8 years now, and I’m no developer.


    • Robert Seder says:

      Yeah – agreed! However, the reason I went from Mint back to regular Ubuntu was for software support. For example: fingerprint readers and my printer drivers. They only seemed to work properly on full Ubuntu (that’s the only thing they test). So, since it’s Linux I know there is ALWAYS a way to get it working, but I was looking for something easy to “just work”.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2 other followers

%d bloggers like this: